When God Gives Up | Chattanooga Valley Baptist Church
UNASHAMED · A Study of Romans

When God
Gives Up

Romans 1:24–32 · Chattanooga Valley Baptist Church

The most terrifying judgment in Scripture is not fire from heaven.
It is silence. God stepping back and saying: have it your way.

The withdrawal of the hand that was holding things together is not indifference. It is judgment. And it may be the most unsettling form of wrath in all of Scripture.

Romans 1:24–32 · Sermon Manuscript

Romans 1:24–32 (ESV)

"Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions... And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done... Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them."

Take It With You

📖

EPUB Edition

Read the full sermon manuscript on any device — phone, tablet, or e-reader.

Download EPUB
📄

Printable PDF

Complete sermon manuscript formatted for print or personal study.

Download PDF
💬

Discussion Guide

Four questions for small groups, family worship, or personal reflection.

View Questions

When God Gives Up

Three times in Romans 1:24–32, Paul repeats the same chilling phrase: "God gave them up." Not as indifference — as judgment. Not fire falling from heaven, but something more unsettling: the withdrawal of the hand that was holding things together. Paul's argument is that when humanity persistently exchanges the Creator for creation, God eventually steps back and says — have it your way.

This passage is not a culture war text. Paul is not filling our hands with rocks to hurl at sinners. He is diagnosing the collapse that follows when worship goes wrong — a collapse that works its way outward from desire, to relationship, to the mind itself.

There is nothing wrong with desire. We all have them — for a good meal, for our children to flourish, for our marriages to thrive. As your pastor, I desire for you all to grow in the grace and knowledge of the Lord. But Paul isn't talking about proper desire. He's talking about disordered desire.

In verse 24, Paul says God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts. The word translated "lusts" here isn't limited to misplaced sexual desire. It points to any inordinate, self-indulgent craving — any desire that takes on the role of an idol and displaces what should be proper affection for God.

As man pursues those lusts, Paul says, they embrace impurity. That word is built around a concept you know — catharsis. A hike up to Lula Lake, standing in the mist of a roaring waterfall — that is cathartic. Running is cathartic for me; it manages stress and produces health. Paul's word here is the negation of that: the disordering of our desires leads us to pursue not what is cathartic, but what is "uncathartic" — things that are inherently against our own interest rather than for it.

Why does sinful man seem inherently committed to pursuing things that are not for our good? Because our desires are fundamentally disordered by our suppression of the truth.

Paul reiterates the exchange he introduced in verse 23. The truth about God is making itself known — unavoidably, relentlessly. You have to work to ignore it.

Some of you have driven through the Great Smoky Mountains on the way to Gatlinburg. You know what that drive looks like — the mountains rising around you, light through the trees, the sheer scale of what God has written into creation through your windshield. The glory is everywhere. It demands a response. And somehow we manage to drive right past it because we've got Ripley's Believe It or Not plugged into the GPS.

We roll past the majesty of what God has put on full display and get genuinely excited about a pancake restaurant shaped like a barn. That's not a failure of attention. That is a choice. And Paul says that's exactly what sinful man does — not accidentally, but willfully.

It's not just that we stopped at the sign and missed the canyon. We turned around, drove back to the sign, built an altar in front of it, and started calling it holy. We made the lesser thing the destination. And we did it on purpose.

And when creation becomes the object of worship rather than the pointer toward the Creator, desire doesn't just get confused — it gets handed over. That's the word Paul uses. Given up. Given over. What follows is not a punishment handed down from outside. It is the natural catastrophe of a soul cut loose from what it was made for.

For the second time in this text, Paul emphasizes God's action of "giving them up" — this time to what he calls dishonorable passions. Christians must treat these verses with what we might call interpretive integrity. We will quickly turn to Romans 1 and Genesis 19 to address homosexuality. But we must not pretend those are the only sins of consequence in Scripture.

C.S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity: "A cold, self-righteous prig, who goes regularly to church, may be far nearer to hell than a prostitute. But of course, it's better to be neither."

Paul isn't pointing to the sin of homosexuality because it is the worst of all sins. He points to it because it perfectly illustrates the argument he is making. Creation itself declares the truth about God — his power, his nature, his design. That declaration is not subtle. Paul said in verse 19 that it is plain, clearly perceived.

It is written into the fabric of the physical world, including the human body itself. Male and female are not arbitrary categories. They are part of the created order through which God has written something undeniably true.

The body speaks. Male and female speak. Marriage speaks.

In the union of male and female we see a remarkable truth — it is the only union capable of producing life in the image of God. The created order is constantly declaring something about the wisdom and design of its Creator.

When Paul highlights same-sex relations as the illustration of the exchange, he is making a specific argument: in order to fully embrace and celebrate what he is describing, you must suppress what creation is plainly declaring — not just theologically, but physically.

The design itself is a declaration. And to reject the design is to suppress the declaration. That is not a culture war argument. That is a creation order argument — and it reaches all the way back to Genesis 1 and 2, where God declares his design before sin ever enters the picture.

Before anyone thinks this text is about somebody else's sin — remember where Paul is headed. Before Romans is finished, every one of us will stand guilty before God. The point of Romans 1 is not to identify the sinners. The point is to expose the depth of humanity's rebellion.

The suppression of truth has shown itself very capable of corrupting our relationships. And chapter 1 ends by revealing how that rebellion reaches all the way into the human mind — because a disordered mind doesn't just affect the person who holds it. It begins to call what is wrong, right — and what is right, wrong. And then it invites everyone around it to agree.

For the third time, Paul tells us God "gave them up" — and this time he highlights the corruption of our whole society. For three verses Paul gives a list of the moral consequences of depraved minds: unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice, envy, murder, strife, deceit, gossip, slander, pride, disobedience. It is a remarkable list. We could all circle some points of struggle in it.

But the list is not the most condemning part of Paul's argument. That comes in verse 32.

Mankind suppresses truth that is evident. The problem is not that we cannot see it. The problem is that we do not want it.

Paul names two profound consequences. First: we know better. We suppress the truth, but we never fully escape it. We act in spite of what we know to be true. But the second consequence is even more alarming.

We do not merely participate in rebellion. We applaud it. That's not just personal moral failure — that's the corruption of the moral ecosystem itself.

A culture that applauds what God condemns has moved past rebellion. It has become a civilization that has lost the capacity to call things by their right name.

The prophet Isaiah warned: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness." This is what happens whenever humanity suppresses truth long enough. Eventually we lose the ability to distinguish light from darkness. And when that happens, the collapse is no longer merely around us.

It has reached within us.

This passage is all rather dark. If it were a painting, there is a lot of black paint on this canvas. But Paul is painting darkness so that we can recognize the light when it appears. He is driving us somewhere — toward the moment where the righteousness we could never produce is freely given to us in Christ.

R.C. Sproul lamented that people in our time seem to care less and less about the gospel. And the reason they care so little is because they have never understood the peril they are in. If we understood the peril, we would stop treating the gospel like optional information and start seeing it as a rescue.

Three times in Romans 1, Paul says: "God gave them up." But the story of the gospel is not merely what God gave up. It is what God gave. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son..."

When humanity exchanged the Creator for creation, God sent His Son. When humanity suppressed the truth, God sent the Truth. When humanity deserved wrath, God offered mercy.

We are not good people who need a little improvement. We are sinners who need rescue. The greatest danger in the room is not that you recognize your sin. The greatest danger is that you continue suppressing what God is making plain.

The same God who gave sinners over to their rebellion now calls sinners to repentance. Don't suppress the truth. Don't explain it away. Don't postpone it for another day. Turn to Christ. Trust Christ. God may have given them up — but God gave His Son that sinners might be saved.

Questions for Study & Small Groups

  1. Paul describes God's "passive wrath" as giving sinners over to the consequences of their own rebellion rather than sending fire from heaven. Why is this form of judgment potentially more terrifying than dramatic divine intervention — and what does it tell us about the nature of sin itself?

  2. The sermon used the image of driving past the Smoky Mountains to get excited about Ripley's Believe It or Not — choosing the lesser thing over the greater glory on full display. Where do you see this pattern in your own life? What does your calendar, your attention, or your money reveal about what you are actually worshiping?

  3. Paul argues that same-sex relations illustrate his larger point about the exchange because embracing them requires suppressing what creation plainly declares about design and complementarity. How does understanding Paul's creation-order argument — rather than treating this as a culture war proof-text — change the way you might engage this topic with someone outside the faith?

  4. Verse 32 identifies approving of others' rebellion as the darkest stage of a depraved mind — calling evil good. In what ways does our current cultural moment reflect this final movement? And how does Romans 1's unflinching diagnosis of humanity's condition actually deepen your gratitude for the gospel rather than diminish it?

Watch & Listen